close
close

first Drop

Com TW NOw News 2024

No, PG&E did not leave the polls powerless during the vote
news

No, PG&E did not leave the polls powerless during the vote

play

The claim: A utility shut off electricity in Republican-leaning parts of California during Election Day voting

A November 5 Threads post (direct link, archive link) accuses one of the nation’s largest utilities of interfering in the presidential election.

“BREAKING: THEY ARE TURNING OUT THE FLOW OF REPUBLICAN VOTERS,” the post’s caption reads. “Pacific Gas & Electric in California has turned off power in several ‘Republican’ areas.”

The post goes on to ask why the company would cut off electricity to polling places on Election Day.

The post was liked almost 200 times in three days.

More from the Fact-Check team: How we select and investigate claims | Email newsletter | Facebook page

Our rating: False

Polling places in California had power throughout Election Day. PG&E warned residents that it may shut off power as a last resort to limit the risk of wildfires, in accordance with California utility regulations. But the shutdown would only take place after virtually all polling stations were closed and polling stations were equipped with backup generators so that voting centers could operate without interruption.

Measures have been taken to maintain power at polling stations

As Election Day approached, PG&E reviewed forecasts of windy and dry conditions in 17 Northern California counties and warned residents that it may have to turn off electricity in some areas to reduce the risk of wildfires. Utilities in California have routinely preemptively shut off power in areas as a last resort to prevent their equipment from sparking wildfires for years to come, according to KUNC News.

However, the shutoffs were planned so they wouldn’t disrupt voting, said Jeff Smith, a PG&E spokesman. The utility provided backup generators for all five polling places that could be affected, and only two of the potential shutdown periods were extended beyond scheduled voting hours.

“This is the first time this has happened on an election day, but we have taken this situation into account,” he told USA TODAY.

The closures ultimately occurred in areas that included all five polling places, Smith said. The utility’s plan called for customers to be notified several times in advance of potential shutoffs, and media reports warned residents of the possible shutoffs and how they were not expected to impact the vote. Backup generation was turned on when needed so voting could continue uninterrupted, Smith said.

Fact check: Video shows conversation with county official, not ‘illegal’ voters ‘cutting’

California regulators ruled in 2012 that investor-owned utilities had the right to shut off the electrical power flowing through their wires “to protect public safety,” a tool that has become increasingly important as their size and cost of forest fires have increased over the past decade. . The move is considered a last resort to “prevent catastrophic wildfires when high winds, heat and related conditions are present” and could, for example, plunge live transmission lines into dry vegetation, according to the California Public Utilities Commission.

The commission also said that utility infrastructure has been identified as a cause of less than 10% of wildfires, but electrical infrastructure represents about half of the most destructive wildfires ever recorded in the state. PG&E’s infrastructure has been linked to some high-profile fires, though it did not admit any wrongdoing in a 2022 settlement of charges stemming from a pair of wildfires in Northern California.

California voters do not need to vote at polling places as all registered voters receive an absentee ballot. These votes will be counted as long as the ballots are returned before Election Day or, if mailed, are postmarked on or before Election Day and are received no later than seven days after Election Day.

USA TODAY could not reach the social media user who shared the claim for comment.

PolitiFact also debunked the claim.

Our fact-checking resources:

Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or e-newspaper here.

USA TODAY is a verified signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network, which requires a proven commitment to impartiality, fairness and transparency. Our fact-checking work is supported in part by a grant from Meta.