Through the ESPN arbitration analyst, the VAR knows that César Ramos makes an ambiguous decision

MÉXICO.- El ex árbitro Felipe Ramos Rizo This category: there is no punishment for a favor Chivas in juego de Play in that the rojiblancos have a dispute Atlasfor a boleto a la Liguilla del Aperture 2024.

Felipe Ramos Rizoanalyst the ESPNconfirm to X that it is quiet Cesar Ramos I’ve decided I can’t get the most out of myself, but that’s it VAR this is the final decision which is ambiguous.

“Cesar Ramos había decidido muy bien, no punishment. It seems that the physical justification caused the consequences of the damage, but then VAR en sancionaron un penal inexistente”, comment Felipe Ramos Rizo and social reasons.

Cerca del minuto 55 de time corrido, Cesar Ramos I made the decision not to make the maximum decision, but I can revise the decision by it VAR It is clear that the era of the rojinegros ended in 57′ in the 1-0 result at the Estadio Akron.

‘Pocho’ Guzman when you impose the punishment. From 11 cards ‘Pocho’ return with your entrance to the costado del portero Atlas.

Criminal law para Atlas

And on the contrary, Felipe Ramos Rizo probably it’s a favor of the area Atlasa punishment that is eventually eliminated Chivas after the match 1-2.

Al mismo tiempo, Ramos Rizo critic A Cesar Ramos by audir al VARwhen you present the frontman.

Already minuto 90+10, the lover of the festival of penance, which may be the case Aldo Rocha.

Y with the triple Atlas is a rival, the opponent of Xolos vs América, and busca de octavo boleto in the great celebration of Mexican football.

César Ramos has decided that he has no penalty, because he has received physical justification for the damage he has suffered, but he has brought in the VAR and imposed a penalty that does not exist as a favor to Chivas @AtlasFC

— Felipe Ramos Rizo (@ramosrizo) November 22, 2024